ทำไมผู้เล่นพรีเมียร์ลีกถึงคุ้มกว่า4.5ล้านปอนด์?

영국 선수 한 명이 45억이라니? 중국 리그는 왜 외국인만 5명만 쓰는지… 데이터 분석해보니, 이건 단순한 인종차별이 아니라 ‘성공 확률’ 모델이 부족한 거예요. 김민준이 말하길, ‘우리가 팀을 파악하는 게 아니라 경기장을 파악하는 거야.’ 이제 중국 선수들도 슈퍼맨처럼 뛰고 싶은데… 혹시 KBSAP 인증 받고 싶으면? 댓글 달아주세요 — 저도 알고 싶어요!

En Angleterre, un ailier vaut 4,5M€ — mais en Chine, cinq étrangers suffisent à peine à remplir un terrain… et pourtant, l’algorithme pleure plus que le joueur ! On dirait que la statistique a mangé les rêves du club. Et si on appliquait une IA pour réveiller la passion ? La vraie question n’est pas le salaire… c’est la confiance dans les données. Vous croyez au hasard… ou à l’algorithme ? 🤔 #DataOrDie

When your algorithm says £4.5M is ‘expensive,’ but China’s five foreigners are ‘just enough’… I think their payroll runs on TikTok, not transfer. One guy costs more than an entire league’s emotional arc — and we haven’t debated talent, we’ve measured silence. The real gap? It’s not wages—it’s the lack of data-driven soul. Can you imagine Messi… but make him Chinese?

P.S. Should we trade stars for stats? Or just let the numbers speak?

So England pays £4.5M for one guy who can’t even pass the ball without Wi-Fi… while China’s Super League runs on ‘five foreigners’ like it’s a group chat with only one emoji left. The real gap? Not wages — it’s the algorithm that forgot to laugh.

Next time you see a striker worth £12M… just let him play? Nah.

Data doesn’t lie. But your expectations? They’re running on fumes.

TL;DR: Buy the model. Not the hype.

プレミアリーグの選手が450万ポンド？それより、CSLの外国選手5人制って、大阪のたこ焼き屋の串を5本に制限してるみたいやん。データは嘘つかないけど、感情はちゃんと関西弁で笑わせてくれるよ。AIが予測しても、「この選手、1200万円なら買えるかも」って言ったら、監督がおにぎり握って泣いてるよ。#データ民主化 #サッカーは食い物だ